Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 1 » Vehicle-to-grid Policy in South Africa: State-led v. Market-directed Approaches

Vehicle-to-grid Policy in South Africa: State-led v. Market-directed Approaches

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

The Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) policy aim has been widely analyzed in policy planning literature but has not been explored for adaptation to African contexts. African countries enjoy immense renewable energy (RE) potential but currently experience minimal electric vehicle usage, since most drivers confront limited charging station access and thus range anxiety. One potential workaround surmounting this obstacle in the short term is to promote V2G charging infrastructure for a subset of vehicles with fixed, shorter-range routes: minibus commuter taxis. This study therefore uses the South African energy-systems general-equilibrium (SATIMGE) linked model in an exploratory analysis of a V2G policy for South Africa’s minibus taxi industry, which, when electrified, would combine optimal charging times for eTransport with their off-take of electricity at periods of system-wide or local peak demand. This in turn would facilitate several publicly beneficial outcomes.
 Adequate implementation requires however that network augmentation costs are addressed along with the provision of flexible charging infrastructure. From the perspective of maximizing generation capacity (and thus, over time, maximizing the proportion of RE generation capacity), the modelling finds that the most preferable scenario would be V2G without controlled charging stipulations (i.e. opportunistic charging influenced by electricity prices subject to network demand). The second most preferable provides additional charging infrastructure capital expenditure and includes controlled charging stipulations but excludes minibus V2G; then minibus V2G including provision of additional charging infrastructure capital expenditure, with business-as-usual being the least preferable. However, this ranked outcome excludes consideration of several additional variables that could realize additional public goods, discussed in the conclusion.

Authors: Fadiel Ahjum and Andrew Lawrence
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.fahj
Keywords: Just Energy Transition, Minibus taxi industry, South Africa, Vehicle-to-Grid
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme