Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
Menu

Vehicle-to-grid Policy in South Africa: State-led v. Market-directed Approaches

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

The Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) policy aim has been widely analyzed in policy planning literature but has not been explored for adaptation to African contexts. African countries enjoy immense renewable energy (RE) potential but currently experience minimal electric vehicle usage, since most drivers confront limited charging station access and thus range anxiety. One potential workaround surmounting this obstacle in the short term is to promote V2G charging infrastructure for a subset of vehicles with fixed, shorter-range routes: minibus commuter taxis. This study therefore uses the South African energy-systems general-equilibrium (SATIMGE) linked model in an exploratory analysis of a V2G policy for South Africa’s minibus taxi industry, which, when electrified, would combine optimal charging times for eTransport with their off-take of electricity at periods of system-wide or local peak demand. This in turn would facilitate several publicly beneficial outcomes.
 Adequate implementation requires however that network augmentation costs are addressed along with the provision of flexible charging infrastructure. From the perspective of maximizing generation capacity (and thus, over time, maximizing the proportion of RE generation capacity), the modelling finds that the most preferable scenario would be V2G without controlled charging stipulations (i.e. opportunistic charging influenced by electricity prices subject to network demand). The second most preferable provides additional charging infrastructure capital expenditure and includes controlled charging stipulations but excludes minibus V2G; then minibus V2G including provision of additional charging infrastructure capital expenditure, with business-as-usual being the least preferable. However, this ranked outcome excludes consideration of several additional variables that could realize additional public goods, discussed in the conclusion.

Authors: Fadiel Ahjum and Andrew Lawrence
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: Number 1

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme