Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
Menu

EEEP » Electricity market design

Tag: Electricity market design

Empirical Stress Test of the Merit‑Order Mechanism Under Extreme Price Shocks: A Unit‑Level Analysis of Coal, Lignite, and Gas Units in Poland during the European Energy Crisis

Posted on July 24, 2026 by

European electricity markets experienced an exceptional stress test in 2021–2023, raising renewed questions about how marginal pricing and the merit‑order mechanism perform under extreme fuel and carbon price shocks. This paper provides a unit‑level empirical assessment of these dynamics for Poland, an electricity system still dominated by coal, with a smaller but growing Combined-Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGTs) fleet and rapidly rising renewables. A transparent short‑run marginal cost (SRMC) model for all centrally dispatched hard‑coal, lignite, and gas‑fired units has been constructed and presented annual merit‑order stacks for 2021–2023. The analysis decomposes SRMC into fuel, transport (hard coal), and EU ETS (Emissions Trading System) components to attribute observed reranking to interpretable cost channels rather than aggregate price movements. The results document a clear crisis‑related reshuffling: record gas prices in 2022 pushed CCGT units markedly rightwards, while the highest‑cost tail remained anchored in the oldest hard‑coal units in all three years. A structured ±25% sensitivity analysis demonstrates robust, technology‑specific exposure profiles: SRMC is fuel‑driven for CCGT, carbon‑driven (EU-ETS) for lignite, and jointly driven by coal and EU ETS costs for hard coal. These results provide a replicable empirical basis for economically coherent phase‑out sequencing and clarify how fossil‑price shocks transmit through marginal pricing to the European electricity market. Policy implications align with the emerging European consensus: maintain marginal pricing for dispatch efficiency, while reducing exposure to fossil‑driven marginality through long‑term contracting, targeted adequacy mechanisms, and accelerated deployment of low‑carbon flexibility

Read more

Resource Adequacy with Increasing Shares of Wind and Solar Power: A Comparison of European and U.S. Electricity Market Designs

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

We raise the question if improvements to current energy-only markets are sufficient to maintain resource adequacy in electricity markets or whether the rapid increase in wind and solar power gives stronger arguments for additional capacity mechanisms. A comparative analysis between Europe and the United States reveals some fundamental differences, but also many similarities in electricity…

Read more

How Renewable Energy is Reshaping Europe’s Electricity Market Design

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

We present a systematic review of the challenges to the regulation of electricity markets that are posed by the integration of variable renewable energy sources. System integration is the key to developing the required flexibility, because flexibility options exist at all system levels and within the competitive as well as in the regulated (network) domains….

Read more

A regulatory framework for an evolving electricity sector: Highlights of the MIT utility of the future study

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

The electric power sector is once again evolving. A variety of distributed energy resources and improving computation, communication, and control technologies create an unprecedented degree of choice for electricity consumers, choices that are poorly guided by electricity rates and other incentives designed for a comparatively simpler era. These technologies also create new tools for regulated…

Read more

Market Power and Generation from Renewables: the Case of Wind in the South Australian Electricity Market

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

This paper examines whether outcomes in the electricity market in South Australia are consistent with theoretical analysis and market modelling that concluded that intermittent generation benefits less from market power than conventional generation. The paper finds that, based on actual outcomes in South Australia over the period from 2006 to 2011, the exercise of market…

Read more

Account

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation electricity market Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy poverty Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe European Union evaluation Flexibility Geopolitics Investment Long-term contracts market design Merit Order Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Spain Sub-Saharan Africa sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme