Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2024 » Volume 13 » Number 1 » Economic efficiency and CO2 impact of a clean cooking program in Ecuador

Economic efficiency and CO2 impact of a clean cooking program in Ecuador

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Clean cooking programs are implemented to replace polluting fuel technologies and fight climate change. In 2014, Ecuador launched a clean cooking program to improve environmental conditions for its population and reduce the large financial burden spent on liquid petroleum gas subsidies. In this paper, we analyze the economic and environmental impacts of this program. We use official macro-data (2015–2021) instead of surveys, which is not common in the studies about these programs. We find that this program saved 978,470 kton of CO2 and reduced Ecuadorian liquid petroleum gas consumption by 3,845,808 barrels, improving the national balance of trade by 151 million USD. However, the rate of return of the subsidies spent in this program was below one, coming in at only 0.72463. We also determine that the subsidized electricity was indeed generated with hydropower. Based on our results, we provide several regulatory recommendations. Households need efficient economic incentives to switch from one energy source to another, and the replaced fuel cannot remain subsidized. Otherwise, the participation predictions made by the implementing institutions might be too optimistic and result in the unnecessary allocation of economic resources to reinforcing grids and commissioning new electricity-generation plants. Finally, the generation technology used to replace subsidized electricity must be renewable to avoid problematic trade-offs.

Authors: Daniel Davi-Arderius and Moisés Obaco
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.13.1.ddav
Keywords: Clean cooking, CO2 emissions, decarbonization, Ecuador, LPG consumption
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme