Skip to content

EEEP

Journal Publications

Menu
Menu

Clean Cooking: Why is Adoption Slow Despite Large Health and Environmental Benefits?

Posted on February 4, 2026 by

More than one-third of the world’s population, mainly the low-income group, still rely on traditional biomass fuels for household cooking. The indoor air pollution from household cooking is one of the main drivers of child mortality in developing countries. It also causes deforestation and emissions of black carbon. A large number of studies show that the benefits of clean cooking, including health and environmental benefits and value of time savings from fuelwood collection, are much higher than the cost of adoption of clean cooking. Over the last four decades, several programs and initiatives have been launched by governments and non-governmental organizations in many developing countries with the help of multilateral and bilateral donor agencies to adopt clean cooking. Two common options adopted are improved-cookstoves and cleaner fuels. However, the adoption of clean cooking has been very slow. This paper discusses the main factors responsible for the slow adoption of clean cooking. We present an extensive review of empirical literature for this purpose. We find that lack of information or awareness, low household income or affordability, and human behavior and social factors are the main barriers to expedite the adoption of clean cooking in developing countries. Finally, we offer some innovative approaches to promote clean cooking policies and programs.

Authors: Govinda R. Timilsina and Sunil Malla
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: Number 1, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Categories

  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 3
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme