Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
Menu

Heterogeneity of State Shale Gas Regulations

Posted on February 4, 2026 by

The rapid rise in shale gas production has affected the role and importance of regulatory policy at all levels of government. As the primary regulator in this area, state level regulatory changes are particularly significant. As shale gas production increases, some states are updating their regulations, while others maintain dated rules, put in place prior to hydraulic fracturing that may or may not address environmental issues specific to modern shale gas development or recent concerns about environmental impacts. Our research finds that state regulation is remarkably heterogeneous. Regulatory heterogeneity includes heterogeneity in the stringency of state regulations. Though heterogeneity in state regulation is not inherently good or bad, our limited data suggests that the heterogeneity is neither explained by differences in state conditions, nor does it necessarily reflect indicators of regulatory capture. The paper also compares the use of regulations to use of liability law, voluntary practices, and information provision. In addition, it identifies new activities being regulated and areas where additional regulation may be needed.

Authors: Alan Krupnick, Nathan Richardson, and Madeline Gottlieb
Download PDF
Category: Number 1, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme