Skip to content

EEEP

Journal Publications

Menu
Menu

Interactions between Market Reform and a Carbon Price in China’s Power Sector

Posted on February 4, 2026 by

The electricity sector accounts for a large share of China’s carbon dioxide emissions and of the economy-wide abatement potential. China’s planned national emissions trading scheme would include electricity generation, as nearly all emissions trading schemes do. The critical difference is that in most existing carbon pricing systems the power sector operates with competitive markets and cost-based pricing, while the Chinese power industry still uses a highly regulated dispatch and pricing system. Together these limitations mean that the effect of a carbon price on China is limited in terms of the impact on operational decisions for existing power stations and in terms of the effects on investment decisions. We explore the channels of interaction between electricity market reform and carbon pricing in China, and provide quantitative estimates of the effects and interactions on electricity sector emissions. A probabilistic discrete choice model is used to simulate the behavior of investors in the power sector. The analysis indicates that market reform can help reduce emissions intensity, but to meet China’s 2030 targets for non-fossil fuel generation a low to moderate carbon price is also necessary; conversely, a carbon price will only be effective with market reform that provides flexibility in dispatch. Using our simplified quantitative analysis, the carbon price required for the same share of non-fossil fuel generation would be about twice as high without market reform. Combining market reform and a carbon price could achieve significant rates of decarbonization and is likely to be the most effective and most feasibly policy package to cut emissions from China’s power sector.
Keywords: Climate change, emission trading scheme, electricity reform, policy interaction

Authors: Fei Teng, Frank Jotzo, and Xin Wang
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: Number 2, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Categories

  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 3
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme