Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 2 » Marginal Emissions Pathways: Drivers and Implications

Marginal Emissions Pathways: Drivers and Implications

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Governments frequently use policies that target the expansion of a clean technology to achieve greenhouse gas emissions mitigation goals, such as those submitted by countries under the Paris Agreement. As a result of direct and indirect market adjustments induced by a particular policy, marginal emissions from expanding a clean technology may vary in the amount of clean technology, reflecting a marginal emissions pathway. This paper analyzes the economic and policy drivers of marginal emissions pathways and the implications when such pathways are non-constant. We show numerically that marginal emissions pathways for a mandate and subsidy to promote biofuels in the U.S. are non-constant in the amount of biofuel and, due to differential impacts on output markets, move in opposite directions and eventually have opposite signs. We also show that explicitly or implicitly treating marginal emissions as constant can generate significant errors in the prediction of mitigation from clean technology policies and can make it difficult to attribute mitigation from decentralized efforts to address climate change, such as the Paris Agreement.

Authors: Richard Klotz, Joel R. Landry, and Antonio M. Bento
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.2.rklo
Keywords: Clean technology policies, Climate change, Emissions prediction, Marginal emissions
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme