Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 2 » Modeling CO2 Pipeline Systems: An Analytical Lens for CCS Regulation

Modeling CO2 Pipeline Systems: An Analytical Lens for CCS Regulation

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is regularly depicted as a crucial technology to reduce the social cost of achieving carbon neutrality. However, its deployment critically depends on the installation of CO2 infrastructures. As the regulatory procedures governing their provision are yet to be clarified, this paper aims to assess the social and environmental impacts of such regulations. We show how the engineering equations of a CO2 pipeline implicitly define a Cobb-Douglas production function. We then infer that the resulting cost function exhibits economies of scale and verifies the technological condition for a natural monopoly. As the possible exertion of market power is a concern, we evaluate the social distortion of the unregulated monopoly and the average-cost pricing solution, which we compare to the outcomes of the welfare-maximizing solution. While the deadweight loss obtained under average-cost pricing remains lower than 5% compared to the first-best solution, our findings indicate that allocative efficiency is an issue, with more than a quarter of the CO2 emissions not being transported. This analysis will usefully inform the emerging regulatory policy debates on CCS by providing the first analytically determined cost function of a CO2 pipeline.

Authors: Adrien Nicolle, Diego Cebreros, Olivier Massol, and Emma Jagu Schippers
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.2.anic
Keywords: Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), CO2 pipelines, Cobb-Douglas, Regulation
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme