Skip to content

EEEP

Journal Publications

Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
  • 2016
    • Vol 1
    • Volume 5
  • 2017
    • Vol 2
    • Volume 6
  • 2018
    • Vol 3
    • Volume 7
  • 2019
    • Vol 4
    • Vol 8
  • 2020
    • Vol 5
    • Volume 9
  • 2021
    • Vol 6
  • 2022
    • Vol 7
    • Volume 10
    • Volume 11
  • 2023
    • Volume 8
    • Volume 12
  • 2024
    • Vol 9
    • Volume 13
  • 2025
    • Vol 10
    • Volume 14
Menu

Resource Adequacy with Increasing Shares of Wind and Solar Power: A Comparison of European and U.S. Electricity Market Designs

Posted on February 4, 2026 by

We raise the question if improvements to current energy-only markets are sufficient to maintain resource adequacy in electricity markets or whether the rapid increase in wind and solar power gives stronger arguments for additional capacity mechanisms. A comparative analysis between Europe and the United States reveals some fundamental differences, but also many similarities in electricity market design on the two continents. We provide a list of general and specific recommendations for improved electricity markets and argue that lessons can and should be learned in both directions. The key to achieve a market-compatible integration of renewable energy is to focus on correct price formation in the short-term. Increased demand-side participation, improved pricing during scarcity conditions, and a transition from technology-specific subsidies of renewables towards adequate pricing of carbon emissions are important measures towards this end. In contrast, an increasing reliance on administrative capacity mechanisms would bring the industry back towards the centralized integrated resource planning that prevailed at the outset of electricity restructuring more than 25 years ago.

Authors: Audun Botterud and Hans Auer
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: 2020, Number 2, Volume 9

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Categories

  • 2012
  • 2013
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • 2016
  • 2017
  • 2018
  • 2019
  • 2020
  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024
  • Number 1
  • Number 2
  • Number 3
  • Volume 1
  • Volume 10
  • Volume 11
  • Volume 12
  • Volume 13
  • Volume 2
  • Volume 3
  • Volume 4
  • Volume 5
  • Volume 6
  • Volume 7
  • Volume 8
  • Volume 9

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme