Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
Menu

Responding to electricity shortfalls: Electricity-saving activities of households and firms in Japan after Fukushima

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Japan has experienced a severe electricity shortfall since the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011 and the subsequent shutdown of nuclear power plants. Disruption to the supply-demand balance was especially severe in Tokyo and Tohoku in summer 2011, forcing the government to introduce mandatory rationing for large customers. Following intensive efforts, a reduction in demand of more than 15% compared with the 2010 level was achieved in these two regions. Surprisingly, most of the savings achieved in 2011 have persisted for almost four years. This paper examines the Japanese experience of saving electricity, based primarily on a detailed review of surveys of households and commercial and industrial customers we conducted each fall from 2011 to 2014. The paper analyzes major electricity-saving measures, energy users’ perceptions and motivations, and trends from 2011 to 2014. The results show that the implementation rates of various electricity-saving measures are declining from the 2011 or 2012 levels, while the actual reduction in demand has remained at almost the same level. This seemingly paradoxical finding can be explained by the cumulative effect of replacing old equipment with newer, more efficient models and adopting new technology such as LED lighting.

Authors: Osamu Kimura and Ken-Ichiro Nishio
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: Number 1

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme