Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2025 » Volume 14 » Number 1 » Settling the metric selection debate for assessing the energy efficiency of energy-intensive industries

Settling the metric selection debate for assessing the energy efficiency of energy-intensive industries

Posted on February 4, 2026February 16, 2026 by admin

This study evaluates energy efficiency in India’s energy-­intensive industries using Total-­Factor Energy Efficiency (TFEE), contrasting it with the traditional Single-­Factor Energy Efficiency (SFEE) approach. Analyzing panel data from 2003–­04 to 2021–­22 from the Prowess database, we applied Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), including the input-­oriented Slack-­based method with variable returns to scale, to assess attainable energy savings. While SFEE studies under the Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme show limited overall impact, with notable improvements in the cement and fertilizer sectors but not in pulp & paper, our TFEE analysis indicates significant efficiency gains in iron & steel and textile sectors but not in cement, pulp & paper, aluminium, or fertilizer. Despite a potential of 55.9% energy savings across industries, overall energy efficiency improved significantly during the period studied. The textile, iron & steel, and pulp & paper sectors show the greatest potential for improvements, at 65%, 61%, and 29%, respectively.

Authors: Prashant Giri and Tarun Sharma
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.14.1.pgir
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis, decarbonization, Energy efficiency, Perform Achieve and Trade
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme