Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » difference-­in-­differences

Tag: difference-­in-­differences

Analyzing the Mechanism of Decentralized Energy Governance Strategy to Reduce Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Posted on March 12, 2026March 12, 2026 by admin

The transition to new energy sources is critical for addressing global carbon emissions. However, there is limited study on how decentralized energy governance (DEG) strategies can effectively promote this transition and mitigate carbon emissions. This study investigates the impact and mechanism of China’s New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy, a prominent DEG strategy, on reducing carbon emissions. Using city-level data from 283 Chinese cities spanning 2006 to 2021, we employ the difference-in-differences method to analyze the policy’s effects. The results suggest that the DEG strategy significantly reduces carbon emissions, primarily through renewable energy innovation and energy transitions. Heterogeneity analysis further highlights that the policy’s effectiveness is more pronounced in non-resource- based cities, R&D-intensive cities, and those with strong environmental regulations. These findings underline the importance of expanding DEG strategies and investing in resources to foster innovation and accelerate energy transitions, providing valuable policy recommendations for achieving carbon neutrality.

Read more

Analysing the Mechanism of Decentralised Energy Governance Strategy on Reducing Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Posted on February 4, 2026February 16, 2026 by admin

The transition to new energy sources is critical for addressing global carbon emissions. However, there is limited study on how decentralized energy governance (DEG) strategies can effectively promote this transition and mitigate carbon emissions. This study investigates the impact and mechanism of China’s New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy, a prominent DEG strategy, on reducing…

Read more

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Expansion planning institutional design Geopolitics Global South grid integration Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Network cost allocation Network expansion planning Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Stranded Assets Sustainability sustainable development

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme