Skip to content

EEEP

Journal Publications

Menu
Menu

The Cost of Finance and the Cost of Carbon: A Case Study of Britain’s only PWR

Posted on February 4, 2026 by

This paper argues that the cost of decarbonising depends critically on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), illustrated with a case study of Sizewell B (SZB, the nuclear station commissioned in 1995). It calculates the cost per tonne of CO2 abated with prices set as for transmission assets by the regulator under the Regulatory Asset Base model. The cost depends critically on the WACC set in comparable utility price controls. At a low WACC the cost is £201936.2/tonne CO2 abated and £201943.3/t. CO2 at the high WACC, compared with the roughly £40/t. CO2 paid by GB generators in 2019. Moving from the social discount rate of 2.5% to a hurdle rate of 8% increases the cost from £15–20/t. to over £60/t. Had Britain continued building replicas of SZB the cost saving compared to the current programme might be £20199–19 billion.

Authors: David Newbery
Download PDFExecutive Summary PDF
Category: Number 2, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags

Air pollution Appliances Charging infrastructure China Circularity Climate change Climate policy community minigrids Economic growth economic reform electric electricity access Electricity market design Electricity markets Electricity networks Electric vehicles Energy Energy communities energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Energy Policy equitable employment evaluation Feminist theory Geopolitics Green bonds informal settlements Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Natural gas Oil prices Path dependency Regulation Renewable energy Resource adequacy Scenarios Sustainability Sustainable cities sustainable development Tax policies Techno-bias

Categories

  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 1
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 2
  • Number 3
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme