Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 1 » Who’s Responsible for Climate Change? New Evidence Based on Country-level Estimates of Climate Debt

Who’s Responsible for Climate Change? New Evidence Based on Country-level Estimates of Climate Debt

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

In this paper we discuss the concept of climate debt, which measures the cumulative economic damages due to CO2 emissions. We find that the climate debt (estimated for 131 countries) is extremely large, equaling some $59 trillion over the 1959–2018 period. Climate debt is also substantial relative to other government liabilities; in the G-20, it equals about 81 percent of GDP. Looking forward to 2035, cumulative climate debt will rise another $80 trillion. Among the biggest emitters, climate debt per capita is the highest in the United States and 6 times as high as that of China (and 25 times as high as that of India). Recent pledges to reduce emissions (such as those in countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs) would still leave the advanced economies with high levels of climate debt per capita relative to the developing world. Reducing emissions to meet the Paris targets needed to limit temperature increases would more significantly reduce climate debt but would be difficult to attain in a fair manner. Given the fiscal pressures countries face from high levels of debt and rising age-related spending, countries could turn to greater taxation of energy with carbon taxes to help reduce climate debt.

Authors: Benedict Clements, Sanjeev Gupta, and Jianhong Liu
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.bcle
Keywords: Carbon tax, Climate change, Climate debt, Externalities, Fiscal policy, Social cost of carbon
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme