Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
Menu

EEEP » 2025 » Volume 14 » Number 1 » Analysing the Mechanism of Decentralised Energy Governance Strategy on Reducing Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Analysing the Mechanism of Decentralised Energy Governance Strategy on Reducing Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Posted on February 4, 2026February 16, 2026 by admin

The transition to new energy sources is critical for addressing global carbon emissions. However, there is limited study on how decentralized energy governance (DEG) strategies can effectively promote this transition and mitigate carbon emissions. This study investigates the impact and mechanism of China’s New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy, a prominent DEG strategy, on reducing carbon emissions. Using city-­level data from 283 Chinese cities spanning 2006 to 2021, we employ the difference-­in-­differences method to analyze the policy’s effects. The results suggest that the DEG strategy significantly reduces carbon emissions, primarily through renewable energy innovation and energy transitions. Heterogeneity analysis further highlights that the policy’s effectiveness is more pronounced in non-­resource-­based cities, R&D-­intensive cities, and those with strong environmental regulations. These findings underline the importance of expanding DEG strategies and investing in resources to foster innovation and accelerate energy transitions, providing valuable policy recommendations for achieving carbon neutrality.

Authors: Tianle Yang, Luobin Zhang, and Qunyang Du
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.14.1.tyan
Keywords: carbon emissions, China, Decentralized energy governance, difference-­in-­differences
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance Demand side difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regional markets Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenario analysis Scenarios Sustainability sustainable development Techno-bias Transmission benefits willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme