Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
Menu

EEEP » 2026 » Volume 15 » Number 2

Number 2

ISSN 2160-5890 (Online)

What Underlies the Poor Financial Performance of Electric Utilities in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Posted on April 29, 2026 by

This study investigates factors responsible for the poor performance of 67 electric utilities in 47 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region using descriptive data available from the World Bank, International Energy Agency, United States Energy Information Administration and national sources. Both cost-and revenue-side factors are found responsible for the poor financial performance of electric utilities in the region. More than two-thirds of vertically integrated utilities (VIUs) and electricity distributional utilities (EDUs) are unable to cover their operational and debt service costs by their revenues. Higher fuel costs (particularly oil), lower capacity factors, lower capital and labor productivity, high transmission and distribution (T & D) losses and leakage in electricity bill collections are found mainly responsible for the poor financial performance. On the other hand, consumers face higher electricity tariffs than in many countries around the world despite their much lower per capita income. The study also investigates how much the reduction of the T&D losses and elimination of the leakages in bill collection improve the financial performance of utilities and finds that out of 25 utilities currently operating in loss, 11 will have higher revenue than their operating costs due to T&D loss reduction and elimination of bill collection leakage. The findings indicate that policymakers in the SSA region should focus on a portfolio of policies, including switching away from expensive generation to emerging cheaper options, improving factor productivities, efficient institutions/governance, reduction of T&D losses, improvement of bill collection and tariff reforms. Policy priority, however, could vary across countries depending on the roles of various factors contributing to the poor financial performance.

Read more

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change climate change policy Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Network cost allocation Network expansion planning nuclear power generation Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainability sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme