Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
Menu

EEEP » 2025 » Volume 14 » Number 1 » Are Credit Rating Agencies Punishing Petrostates for Energy Transition Risks?

Are Credit Rating Agencies Punishing Petrostates for Energy Transition Risks?

Posted on February 4, 2026February 16, 2026 by admin

The energy transition is expected to leave fossil fuel producers with weakened economies and stranded assets, but the time horizon of these effects is uncertain. This article offers a window into these effects by studying the sovereign credit ratings of petrostates. Credit ratings are both forward-­looking indicators of their economic outlook and determinants of petrostates’ ability to raise capital, and may thus already reflect concerns about the energy transition’s anticipated effects. Using data on sovereign credit rating decisions, this article studies changes in petrostate ratings over time. We find some signs that they are declining, but also that this is not primarily the result of systematic downgrades. For the time being, credit rating agencies are instead rewarding petrostates less for high oil prices and punishing them more for low levels of economic diversification. The short-­to-­medium term risk horizon of rating agencies means that future downgrades could come suddenly and steeply.

Authors: Brian Blankenship, Indra Overland, Johannes Urpelainen, and Joonseok Yang
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.14.1.bbla
Keywords: credit ratings, Energy Policy, Energy transition, Oil, petrostates, Renewable energy
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change climate change policy Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Network cost allocation Network expansion planning nuclear power generation Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainability sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme