Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
Menu

EEEP » 2015 » Volume 4 » Number 2 » Internalizing the Climate Externality: Can a Uniform Price Commitment Help?

Internalizing the Climate Externality: Can a Uniform Price Commitment Help?

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

It is difficult to resolve the global warming free-rider externality problem by negotiating many different quantity targets. By contrast, negotiating a single internationally-binding minimum carbon price (the proceeds from which are domestically retained) counters self-interest by incentivizing agents to internalize the externality. In this contribution I attempt to sketch out, mostly with verbal arguments, the sense in which each agent’s extra cost from a higher emissions price is counter-balanced by that agent’s extra benefit from inducing all other agents to simultaneously lower their emissions in response to the higher price. Some implications are discussed. While the paper could be centered on a more formal model, here the tone of the discussion resembles more that of an exploratory think piece directed to policy-makers and the general public.

Authors: Martin L. Weitzman
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.4.2.mwei
Keywords: Climate change, Global warming, international public goods, prices versus quantities, UN climate negotiations
🔓 Download PDF🔓 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation electricity market Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy poverty Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe European Union evaluation Flexibility Geopolitics Investment Long-term contracts market design Merit Order Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Spain Sub-Saharan Africa sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme