Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
Menu

EEEP » 2020 » Volume 9 » Number 1 » Polar Vortexes in New England: Missing Money, Missing Markets, or Missing Regulation?

Polar Vortexes in New England: Missing Money, Missing Markets, or Missing Regulation?

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

The 2014 and 2017-18 “polar vortex” events in New England served as virtual controlled experiments on how competitive natural gas and electricity markets coexist uneasily almost two decades after different kinds of regulatory restructuring initiatives freed different kinds of competitive forces to support the supply infrastructure in each energy market. As a region with no indigenous fossil fuels that relies on interstate pipelines to feed its fast-growing fleet of competitive combined-cycle natural gas turbine (CCGT) generation plants, New England shows where the interface of regulation and competition in those two different energy markets fails to serve the region’s energy consumers in the face of a predictably recurring weather patterns. We chart the polar vortex problems in New England, describe the energy markets that supply the region, describe how each market deals with the risk of committing capital to serve a region with such extreme weather patterns and explain the institutional problem that makes useful solutions difficult.

Authors: Jeff D. Makholm and Laura T.W. Olive
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.8.2.jmak
Keywords: Electric Utilities, Energy, Gas Utilities, Organizational Behavior, Pipelines, Property Rights, Regulation and Industrial Policy, Transaction costs
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation electricity market Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy poverty Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe European Union evaluation Flexibility Geopolitics Investment Long-term contracts market design Merit Order Middle East Natural gas Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Spain Sub-Saharan Africa sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme