Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
      • Number 4
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 1 » The (indirect) Effects of Windfall Funds on Sustainability Behavior: Insights for Carbon Fee Dividends

The (indirect) Effects of Windfall Funds on Sustainability Behavior: Insights for Carbon Fee Dividends

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Motivated by proposed Carbon Dividend legislation in the U.S., we test the impacts of a monetary windfall on sustainability behavior under information conditions about the source of the funds. We find that windfall funds, particularly when presented as a refund, positively impact stated intent to engage in transportation-related sustainable behaviors. Evidence suggests that participants are sensitive to compensation amounts, where a higher compensation amount led to a higher rate of sustainable behavior intention. We also find a small positive spillover effect from individuals who intend to spend the windfall on transportation-related activities and their stated future sustainable behavior, although results are driven by differences across participants’ source of environmental motivation. Socio-demographics may partially explain this result. A connection to the environment, either through previous donations or employment, or a belief in human-induced climate change, produced higher declarations for pro-environmental behavior. Our results provide important insights into the indirect behavioral effects of a (carbon fee) dividend, and provide avenues for future research.

Authors: Shana M. McDermott and Caroline L. Noblet
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.smcd
Keywords: Behavioral spillover, Carbon Dividend Act, Windfall effects
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation electricity market Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy communities Energy crisis energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy poverty Energy security Energy transition Europe European Union evaluation Flexibility Geopolitics Investment market design Merit Order Middle East Natural gas Policy policy instruments quantile regression Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Smart meters Spain Sub-Saharan Africa

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme