Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
Menu

EEEP » 2023 » Volume 12 » Number 1 » The (indirect) Effects of Windfall Funds on Sustainability Behavior: Insights for Carbon Fee Dividends

The (indirect) Effects of Windfall Funds on Sustainability Behavior: Insights for Carbon Fee Dividends

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

Motivated by proposed Carbon Dividend legislation in the U.S., we test the impacts of a monetary windfall on sustainability behavior under information conditions about the source of the funds. We find that windfall funds, particularly when presented as a refund, positively impact stated intent to engage in transportation-related sustainable behaviors. Evidence suggests that participants are sensitive to compensation amounts, where a higher compensation amount led to a higher rate of sustainable behavior intention. We also find a small positive spillover effect from individuals who intend to spend the windfall on transportation-related activities and their stated future sustainable behavior, although results are driven by differences across participants’ source of environmental motivation. Socio-demographics may partially explain this result. A connection to the environment, either through previous donations or employment, or a belief in human-induced climate change, produced higher declarations for pro-environmental behavior. Our results provide important insights into the indirect behavioral effects of a (carbon fee) dividend, and provide avenues for future research.

Authors: Shana M. McDermott and Caroline L. Noblet
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.smcd
Keywords: Behavioral spillover, Carbon Dividend Act, Windfall effects
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change climate change policy Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Network cost allocation Network expansion planning nuclear power generation Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainability sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme