Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
      • Number 4
Menu

EEEP » 2025 » Volume 14 » Number 1 » Does the Shale Gas Revolution Hinder Clean Energy Innovation?

Does the Shale Gas Revolution Hinder Clean Energy Innovation?

Posted on February 4, 2026February 16, 2026 by admin

We analyze the causal impact of the U.S. shale gas revolution on technological innovation in the electricity generation sector. Using a country-­level data set of electricity patents from 1978-­2018, we find that the U.S. shale gas revolution led to a 1.60 decrease in the ratio of green to fossil-­fuel electricity patents and a 0.93 decrease in the ratio of renewable to fossil-­fuel electricity patents. In addition, we find a 0.15 increase in the share of fossil-­fuel electricity patenting. These results suggest that the U.S. shale boom hinder the development of new and improved technologies that ease the decarbonization of the electricity sector.

Authors: Itziar Lazkano, Siyu Feng, and Duygu Ekin Ayasli
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.14.1.ilaz
Keywords: Electricity sector, Energy Policy, induced technical change, Innovation
🔐 Download PDF🔐 Executive Summary PDF

Account

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tags

carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change Climate policy computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation electricity market Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy communities Energy crisis energy economics Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy poverty Energy security Energy transition Europe European Union evaluation Flexibility Geopolitics Investment market design Merit Order Middle East Natural gas Policy policy instruments quantile regression Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Smart meters Spain Sub-Saharan Africa

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme