Skip to content
EEEP
Menu
  • 2012
    • Volume 1
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
      • Number 3
  • 2013
    • Volume 2
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2014
    • Volume 3
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2015
    • Volume 4
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2016
    • Volume 5
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2017
    • Volume 6
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2018
    • Volume 7
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2019
    • Volume 8
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2020
    • Volume 9
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2021
    • Volume 10
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
    • Volume 9
      • Number 2
  • 2022
    • Volume 10
      • Number 2
    • Volume 11
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2023
    • Volume 11
      • Number 2
    • Volume 12
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2024
    • Volume 13
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
  • 2025
    • Volume 14
      • Number 1
  • 2026
    • Volume 15
      • Number 1
      • Number 2
Menu

EEEP » 2012 » Volume 1 » Number 1 » The New Energy-industrial Revolution and International Agreement on Climate Change

The New Energy-industrial Revolution and International Agreement on Climate Change

Posted on February 4, 2026February 9, 2026 by admin

At the heart of the analysis of, and progress on, action on climate change, at both country and international levels, must be an understanding of three sets of issues. The first concerns scale: of the risks from unmanaged climate change; of the necessary response; and of the great economic and social opportunities from the new low-carbon energy-industrial revolution. Low-carbon growth will be more dynamic, creative, cleaner and more bio-diverse; high-carbon growth will self-destruct. Second, in trying to work towards international action we must understand how key countries and blocs are moving: action in one country will be influenced by confidence in where others are going. Many have moved in positive directions in recent years. Third, action on the scale required will involve policy at the national level (“bottom-up”) and collective action at the international level (“top-down”): progress and agreement will depend on an understanding of how they support and encourage each other.

Authors: Nicholas Stern and James Rydge
DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.1.1.9
Keywords: Cancu´n, Copenhagen, Durban, Emissions, Energy-industrial revolution, International agreement
🔐 Download PDF

Account

  • Log in

Tags

Air pollution carbon emissions Carbon tax China Climate change climate change policy Climate policy Coal computable general equilibrium Cost of Debt Decentralized energy governance difference-­in-­differences Electricity generation Electricity market design Electricity markets Electric Utilities Energy Energy efficiency Energy Policy Energy R&D Energy security Energy transition environmental regulation Europe evaluation Geopolitics Introduction Investment Long-term contracts Middle East Natural gas Network cost allocation Network expansion planning nuclear power generation Oil prices Regulation Renewable energy Renewables Resilience Resource adequacy Scenarios Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainability sustainable development willingness-to-pay

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
© 2026 EEEP | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme